Students' perceptions of listening learning in English: A qualitative descriptive study on challenges, strategies, and attitudes

Authors

  • Husnani Aliah Universitas Muhammadiyah Palopo
  • A.Nurhayati Universitas Muhammadiyah Palopo
  • Septya Suarja Universitas Muhammadiyah Palopo
  • Hikrawati Universitas Muhammadiyah Palopo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37058/tlemc.v10i1.447

Keywords:

Attitudes, Challenges, Listening Learning, Strategies, Students' Perceptions.

Abstract

The urgency of this research arises from the gap between the importance of listening skills in academic and professional communication and students' low self-confidence and learning outcomes in this area. Students' perceptions of the listening learning process play a crucial role in English competency achievement. The objectives of this study are: (1) to describe students' perceptions of English listening learning; (2) to identify the main challenges students face in the listening learning process; (3) to explore the strategies students use to overcome listening difficulties; and (4) to analyze students' affective responses to English listening learning activities in class and independently. This study used a descriptive qualitative method. Data were collected through in-depth semi-structured interviews, classroom observations, and open-ended questionnaires. Data analysis was conducted using thematic analysis techniques, which included the following stages: data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. This study yielded a comprehensive picture of students' perceptions of English listening learning through thematic analysis of data from 20 participants. Four main themes were identified: (1) The students have different opinions about listening, but most of them agree that listening is challenging; (2) multilevel challenges encompassing linguistic, cognitive, and affective dimensions. The obstacles faced by a person do not only come from one source, but occur at three different levels at once, namely the language level, thought processes, and feelings; (3) There are many different ways used to achieve a goal, but most of these methods rely on digital-based tools, devices, or systems. (4) a motivational landscape characterized by conditional anxiety but also motivation responsive to the relevance of the material. These findings contribute to listening pedagogy by emphasizing the importance of integrating authentic listening materials, explicit strategy instruction, structured digital resources, and supportive assessment practices to enhance students’ listening engagement and confidence in EFL contexts.

References

Abdillah, AH. (2018). Pengalaman menulis ekspresif dalam menurunkan burnout pada mahasiswa jurusan psikologi Islam Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Humaniora UIN Antasari Banjarmasin (Skripsi Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari). Respositori Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari.

Anggraeni, N. (2016). Layanan pendidikan inklusif bagi peserta didik tunanetra (Skripsi Sarjana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia). Respositori Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Chen, S., Wallace, M. P., Ieng, H. S., Chen, Y., Lam, W. K., & Correia de Oliveira, S. (2023). Foreign language listening comprehension and listening anxiety. TESL-EJ: Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language, 27(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.27106a9

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.

Dewi, T. P. (2023). EFL students’ perceptions of using Youtube in an academic listening class. Wiralodra English Journal, 7(2), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.31943/wej.v7i2.215

Field, J. (2008). Listening in the Language Classroom. Cambridge University Press.

Field, J. (2009). Listening in the Language Classroom (Vol. 64, Issue 1). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccp090

Gilakjani, A. P., & Sabouri, N. B. (2016). Learners’ listening comprehension difficulties in English language learning: A literature review. English Language Teaching, 9(6), 123. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n6p123

Goh, C. C. M., & Vandergrift, L. (2021). Teaching and learning second language listening: Metacognition in action. Teaching and Learning Second Language Listening: Metacognition in Action, 1–361. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429287749

Husnawati, N., Puspitasari, M., & Yundayani, A. (2024). Enhancing intrinsic motivation and listening skills through integrating authentic learning materials. English Review: Journal of English Education, 12(2), 559–566. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v12i2.9761

Isaadah, K. (2023). Students’ perception of the use of English podcast in listening skills. English Focus: Journal of Egnlish Language Education, 7(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.24905/efj.v7i1.165

Kaur, K. (2014). Teaching listening or testing listening ? TLEMC (Teaching & Learning English in Multicultural Contexts), 1(1).

Kim, J. (2022). The Interconnectivity of heutagogy and education 4.0 in higher online education. Canadian Journal Learning and Technology, 48(4), 2022.

Li, J., & Zhao, K. (2025). Chinese English learners’ recognition of foreign-accented words: Roles of sentence context, accent strength, and second language listening proficiency. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 68(5), 2517–2535. https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_JSLHR-23-00564;JOURNAL:JOURNAL:JSHR;PAGEGROUP:STRING:PUBLICATION

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications.

Ma’fiyah, I., Sitoresmi, U., & Yulianto, I. (2021). EFL students’ perception of virtual learning in listening class: A classroom implementation. English Review: Journal of English Education, 10(1), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v10i1.5365

Mansouri, K., & Graham, S. (2025). Self-regulation in L2 listening: The role of teacher and learner self-efficacy and the mediating influence of metacognition. System, 129(January), 103598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2025.103598

Marzona, Y. (2023). An analysis of students’ difficulties in listening comprehension at English education department in faculty of teacher training and education of Universitas Ekasakti. JIPS: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Scholastic, 7(2), 28–33. http://e-journal.sastra-unes.com/index.php/JIPS

Meng, Y., Wang, Y., & Zhao, N. (2023). Cognitive diagnostic assessment of EFL learners’ listening barriers through incorrect responses. Frontiers in Psychology, 14(August). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1126106

Nur, S., Sakkir, G., & Rosmini. (2022). EFL students’ anxiety in oral presentation in thesis examination during Covid- 19 pandemic era: Factors and strategies. ARRUS Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(2), 144–159. https://doi.org/10.35877/soshum791

Nuralisa, N., Qalyubi, I., & Ali Mirza, A. (2025). Real voices, real learning: Students’ perceptions of authentic listening materials. Journal of English Language and Education, 10(2), 70–81. https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v10i2.703

Permatasari, N., Syam, U. K., & Sastrawati, I. (2023). Exploring students ’ difficulties in learning listening comprehension at second semester English education deaprtment of Muhammadiyah University of Makassar. Journal of Language Testing and Assessment, 3(1), 40–50.

Pham, T. D. K., & Le, T. N. D. (2025). Listening comprehension in English language learning: Challenges, strategies, and students’ attitudes at a private university. International Journal of Language Instruction, 4(3), 22–40. https://doi.org/10.54855/IJLI.25432

Robillos, R. J., & Bustos, I. G. (2022). Learners’ listening skill and metacognitive awareness through metacognitive strategy instruction with pedagogical cycle. International Journal of Instruction, 15(3), 393–412. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15322a

Rost, M. (2015). Teaching and Researching Listening (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315732862

Rost, M. (2016). Teaching and Researching Listening. Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.

Rungsinanont, S. (2024). Factors and problems affecting English listening comprehension skills of EIC undergraduate students at Rmutl Tak, Thailand. In Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental (Vol. 18, Issue 5). https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n5-043

Sudewi, P. W., & Isma, A. (2023). Students’ perception on utilization of technology in listening learning. Scope : Journal of English Language Teaching, 8(1), 160. https://doi.org/10.30998/scope.v8i1.18331

Taghizadeh, M., & Emam, N. S. (2023). Technology-enhanced academic listening classes: instructors’ and engineering students’ attitudes and views. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 12528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-023-09384-z

Teng, Mark Feng. (2020). The role of metacognitive knowledge and regulation in mediating university EFL learners’ writing performance. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2019.1615493

Thompson, A. S., & Khawaja, A. J. (2016). Foreign language anxiety in Turkey: The role of multilingualism. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 37(2), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2015.1031136

Tran, L., Nguyen, T. T. B., & Do, D. T. X. (2025). Exploring EFL listening anxiety and its correlation with learners’ perceived listening proficiency, interest, and practice. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 15(6), 1753–1765. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1506.04

Tran, N., Hoang, D. T. N., Gillespie, R., Yen, T. T. H., & Phung, H. (2024). Enhancing EFL learners’ speaking and listening skills through authentic online conversations with video conferencing tools. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1229, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2024.2334809

Vy, L. T. M., & Jinming, L. (2024). Are Chinese university students ready for autonomous English listening practice? SiSal Journal, 15(3), 443–461. https://doi.org/10.37237/202403

Xiao, Y. (2025). The impact of AI-driven speech recognition on EFL listening comprehension, flow experience, and anxiety: a randomized controlled trial. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04672-8

Yang, F. Y. (2021). EFL learners’ autonomous listening practice outside of the class. SiSal Journal, 12(4), 328–346. https://doi.org/10.37237/110403

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30